Hantek’s DSO2000 series offers excellent value for entry-level oscilloscopes, but choosing between models can be confusing. The DSO2C10 and DSO2D10 share identical core specifications, both are 100 MHz, 2-channel scopes with 1 GSa/s sampling and 8 M memory depth. The difference is a single letter and approximately $40–60. That letter represents one crucial feature, a built-in arbitrary waveform generator (AWG). Here’s whether it’s worth the premium.
📊 Comparison Table (Quick Look)
| Feature | DSO2C10 | DSO2D10 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $180–220 | $220–280 |
| Bandwidth | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Channels | 2 analog | 2 analog |
| Sampling Rate | 1 GSa/s | 1 GSa/s |
| Memory Depth | 8 Mpts | 8 Mpts |
| Display | 7″ 800×480 WVGA | 7″ 800×480 WVGA |
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Built-in AWG | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (25 MHz) |
| Protocol Decoding | ✅ I2C, SPI, UART, CAN, LIN | ✅ I2C, SPI, UART, CAN, LIN |
| Trigger Types | 14 types | 14 types |
| Auto Measurements | 32 with statistics | 32 with statistics |
| DVM Function | ✅ Dual 3-digit | ✅ Dual 3-digit |
| Frequency Counter | ✅ 6-digit hardware | ✅ 6-digit hardware |
| PC Software | ✅ Full remote control | ✅ Full remote control |
| Fanless Operation | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| FFT Analysis | ✅ Multiple windows | ✅ Multiple windows |
| SCPI Commands | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Signal Generator Output | N/A | Adjustable 0–5 V, 25 MHz max |
| Arbitrary Waveforms | N/A | ✅ Yes |
| Best For | Budget priority, have generator | Integrated solution, no generator |
🔑 The Core Difference: Built-in Signal Generator
This is the entire story in a nutshell:
DSO2C10: Oscilloscope only
DSO2D10: Oscilloscope + 25 MHz AWG (arbitrary waveform generator)
Everything else, bandwidth, channels, sampling rate, memory, triggers, protocol decoding, software, display, is identical. You’re paying extra exclusively for the integrated signal generator capability. The “D” models (DSO2D10 and DSO2D15) include the AWG, the “C” models (DSO2C10 and DSO2C15) do not.
The built-in generator in the DSO2D10 produces standard waveforms (sine, square, triangle, sawtooth, pulse, etc.) with adjustable frequency up to 25 MHz and adjustable amplitude. It supports arbitrary waveform output, meaning you can create custom waveforms and output them for testing. This is significantly more practical than FNIRSI’s fixed-voltage approach.
🧰 Shared Features: What You Get With Both
Since 95 percent of the specifications are identical, here’s what both models deliver:
Display and Interface
7-inch 800×480 WVGA color TFT display with clear, bright visuals. Traditional button-and-knob layout that follows conventional oscilloscope design. Fanless operation makes them silent, a genuine advantage over cheaper competitors.
Bandwidth and Sampling
100 MHz analog bandwidth (realistic for signals up to ~20–30 MHz following the 1:5 rule), 1 GSa/s real-time sampling rate, 8 M memory depth that enables long captures at high sample rates.
Protocol Decoding
A standout feature at this price point. Both models decode and trigger on I2C, SPI, UART/RS232, CAN, and LIN, invaluable for microcontroller and embedded systems work. Most $200–250 scopes omit this entirely.
Measurement Features
32 automatic measurements with real-time statistics (max, min, standard deviation), dual 3-digit digital voltmeters (DVM), 6-digit hardware frequency counter, cursor measurements, and FFT analysis with multiple windowing functions.
PC Software
Comprehensive remote-control software (DSO2000) that allows full oscilloscope operation from your computer, plus simultaneous FFT and XY-mode display. An arbitrary waveform editor lets you design custom waveforms graphically. SCPI command support enables automation.
Build Quality
Both feel substantially better than ultra-budget options like the FNIRSI 1014D. Buttons have good tactility, knobs are smooth, and the overall construction inspires confidence for benchtop use.
🤔 Decision Framework: Do You Need the Generator?
The $40–60 premium for the DSO2D10 boils down to a simple question, will you use a signal generator?
You NEED the DSO2D10 (with AWG) if:
- You’re testing filters, amplifiers, or frequency-dependent circuits
- You work with audio electronics (signal injection for troubleshooting)
- You’re learning electronics and want hands-on experience with signal generation
- You don’t already own a dedicated function generator
- You value bench space (2-in-1 reduces clutter)
- You work in the field or travel with equipment
The DSO2C10 (scope only) makes sense if:
- You already own a quality function generator
- Your work is purely measurement and troubleshooting
- You’re on an absolute budget constraint
- You prefer separate, dedicated instruments
- You’ll never need to generate test signals (rare, but possible)
Reality check
If you don’t currently own a function generator and can afford the extra $40–60, get the DSO2D10. Even if you rarely use the generator initially, having it integrated when you need it saves buying a separate unit later. Function generators alone cost $50–100+ for decent quality.
💰 Pricing and Value
DSO2C10: Typically $180–220
DSO2D10: Typically $220–280
The price spread varies by seller and promotions, but expect a $40–60 difference.
Value assessment
Both represent excellent value for 100 MHz scopes with protocol decoding. The DSO2D10’s integrated AWG delivers better value overall if you have any use for signal generation, buying the capabilities together costs less than purchasing separately.
🗣️ What Actual Users Think
Electronics forums reveal clear patterns in user experiences. On AllAboutCircuits, users directly comparing the models note that the generator is the sole meaningful difference.
A recurring theme is regret avoidance, users who initially bought the DSO2C10 to save money often wish they had the generator later. Reviews consistently highlight the usefulness of the integrated AWG for learning, troubleshooting, and light design work, with the caveat that it’s a convenience tool, not a replacement for a high-end standalone generator.
The consensus from repair shops and hobbyists is simple, unless you’re certain you’ll never need signal generation, the DSO2D10’s extra cost is justified.
✅ Recommendations
Choose DSO2C10 if:
- You own a quality function generator already
- Your budget is absolutely capped at $200
- Your work is 100 percent measurement-based
- You prefer fully separate instruments
Choose DSO2D10 if:
- You don’t own a function generator
- You want a 2-in-1 solution for space or portability
- You work with filters, amplifiers, or audio circuits
- You’re learning electronics
- You can afford the $40–60 premium
- You value future flexibility
The verdict
For the vast majority of users, the DSO2D10 delivers better long-term value. The integrated 25 MHz AWG costs less as a bundle than buying separately, eliminates a device from your bench, and provides real utility for circuit testing and learning.
Bottom line
Unless you have a specific, well-considered reason to skip the generator, spend the extra $40–60 for the DSO2D10. It’s the smarter investment for nearly everyone entering the oscilloscope market at this price point.